�Subornation of false muster�: The case against �Dr. Dino� and Young Earth Creationism
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D.
Online
Journal Contributing Writer
Aug 17, 2006, 00:13
You remember Kent Hovind, aka �Dr. Dino,� although his claim
to the �Dr.� and academic credentials is
questionable, at best. He�s the founder of Florida-based Creation Science Evangelism which, among its
other quaint novelties, offers Dinosaur Adventure
Land and this hokey (not to
mention grammatically challenged) promo on its homepage:
Hey families! Dinosaur Adventure Land
has got so many wonderful events coming up that you may want to stop in
sometime! Since the success of our Home school Appreciation Day of 2006, we
have decided to do more themed-events at Dinosaur Adventure Land. To start
things off, we have decided to make April fool�s Day (April 1st) �Darwin Day.�
We will have tons of great rides, puzzles, treasure hunts, and prizes to fill
out the day. We sure hope to see all of you here at Dinosaur Adventure land,
where Dinosaurs and the Bible meet!
Creation Science Evangelism and Dinosaur Adventure Land are
dedicated to Young
Earth Creationism at its most ludicrous: human children playing with
dinosaurs in Eden, Mr. and Mrs. Tyrannosaurus Rex on Noah�s ark.
Well, it seems Dr. Dino is in a spot of trouble with the
Internal Revenue Service. The IRS has charged him with 58 counts of tax fraud. Specifically,
Dr. Dino is �charged with failing to
pay nearly $474,000 in federal income, Social Security and Medicare taxes for
employees at his Creation Science Ministry. Hovind has maintained the workers
are missionaries and are exempt from taxes and that all his money and
possessions belong to God and are not subject to taxation.�
Furthermore, Dr. Dino claims he himself is �employed by God�
and, therefore, the Internal Revenue
Service and the U.S. Attorney�s Office do not �have jurisdiction in this
matter.�
Hovind and his wife,
who is herself charged with 44 counts of tax fraud, entered a unique plea:
"I would like to plead subornation of false muster.�
As Mark O�Brien noted
in his Pensacola News Journal article
about the case, that�s �a defense I haven�t heard in 30 years of hanging around
courtrooms. The precedent is not good. A man in the state of Washington tried a
similar defense a few years ago, claiming he was a �citizen of heaven� and
not subject to state laws. But a court there ruled that when in Washington, do
as Washington law requires, and found him guilty� [links added].
So what does
�subornation of false muster� mean?
Subornation:
1: to induce secretly to do an unlawful
thing
2: to induce to commit perjury; also:
to obtain (perjured testimony) from a witness
Muster:
1: a representative specimen
2a: an act of assembling; specifically:
formal military inspection b: critical examination
c: an assembled group
But those are
dictionary definitions.
After consulting
defense attorneys and other legal experts, I learned the basic definitions are
essentially the meaning of the plea. Hovind is claiming that, under false pretenses, he is forcibly being called
into service as a member of a group to which he does not rightfully belong �
namely those subject to paying taxes � for the sole purpose of then being
wrongly prosecuted.
But here�s the
kicker: Kent Hovind and his wife
are being represented by a public defender, at
taxpayers� expense.
The �subornation
of false muster� plea aside, as Mark O�Brien noted, Dr. Dino�s legal track
record is not good. He has already lost cases �with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and with Escambia County�s right to
require building permits for his Dinosaur Adventure Land.� It seems Hovind
believes no man-made laws apply to him, only �God�s.� But apparently he�s not
familiar with the Bible he claims to be the sole source of �Truth� and �God�s
law,� as one person who commented on O�Brien�s article noted:
Dr. Dino . .
. says that he works for God, that he believes the Holy Bible is the inerrant
Word of God, and that because he works for God he does not owe any income
taxes. Yet in Matthew 22:21 the Bible plainly says that Jesus said � . . . Render
therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar�s; and unto God the things
that are God�s.� So it sure seems that Dr. Dino�s (alleged) Boss is also (along
with the I.R.S.) expecting Dr Dino to pay his income taxes. Some faithful
employee!
Of course,
the Court will not be concerned with whether Dr. Dino interprets that Bible
passage correctly, but will decide whether Dr. Dino properly interprets I.R.S.
(or, �Caesar�s�) law. I suppose that even though Dr. Dino had a withdrawable $430,500 in the bank and withdrew it
(as has been reported), he will present to the Court as a defense that, being
employed by God, he has no income, no expenses, and owns no property. Oh yeah,
THAT�ll impress the Court! [italics added]
The indictment
showed that the Hovinds had repeatedly made cash withdrawals from a sizable
bank account at AmSouth Bank in a way calculated to evade federal requirements
for reporting cash transactions. The withdrawals were for $9,500 or $9,600. Is
it coincidental that those amounts are just below the federally mandated
$10,000 threshold for reporting cash transactions?
It must be noted
that poor Dr. Dino, who claims no financial resources, offered a $250,000 reward to anyone offering
�sufficient proof� of evolution. His and Creation Science Evangelism�s
standards would, of course, be the bases for determining �sufficient proof.�
All the natural history museums worldwide provide inadequate proof as far as
Dr. Dino, Creation Science Evangelism, and Young Earth Creationists are
concerned.
The shenanigans of Kent Hovind are typical of the sanctimonious
whose only real interest is themselves. In the past we had Jimmy
Swaggart and Jim
Bakker. Today we have �Lucky
Louie� Sheldon and former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed. And
let�s not forget fat-cats Jerry
Falwell who blamed 9/11 on gay Americans and Pat Robertson who seems
to have missed the �Thou shall not murder� commandment.
The hoaxes of Dinosaur Adventure Land, Young Earth
Creationists and their Intelligent
Design brethren are attempting to pervert science and turn public school
science classes into religious
studies classes. The sophism DAL, YEC and ID represent � like all sophistry
� comes cloaked in noble sounding phrases such as �free marketplace of ideas.�
Jonathan Witt is �senior fellow� at the Seattle-based
Discovery Institute, the primary organization pushing Intelligent Design. He
made just such a sophomoric argument in a July 27 article:
�Such a free marketplace of ideas is
crucial to a solid education, and it�s what the current Kansas science
standards promote.�
Kansas is the state that redefined
�science� to include metaphysical (aka �religious�) explanations for
natural phenomena. Not surprisingly, Discovery Institute was working hard
in Kansas to further pollute real science. But they lost, big time, as The New York Times reported
on August 2:
Conservative Republicans
who pushed anti-evolution standards back into Kansas schools last year have
lost control of the state Board of Education once again.
The most
closely watched race was in western Kansas, where incumbent conservative Connie
Morris lost her Republican primary Tuesday. The former teacher had described
evolution as �an age-old fairy tale� and �a nice bedtime story� unsupported by
science.
As
a result of Tuesday�s vote, board members and candidates who believe evolution
is well-supported by evidence will have a 6-4 majority. Evolution skeptics had
entered the election with a two-person majority.
Witt did, however, make one accurate statement: �The truly
confident Darwinist should be eager to tell students, �Hey, notice these
crucial unsolved problems in modern evolutionary theory. Maybe one day you�ll
be one of the scientists who discovers a solution.��
�One
of the scientists who discovers a solution.� Yes, one of the scientists using the scientific method
and accepted scientific protocols, not whimsical notions predicated upon
socio-political, religious, and economic agendas such as those concocted by
advocates of Intelligent Design, Young Earth Creationism, and �Dr. Dino.�
Copyright © 1998-2006 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor