War without context: Fatah, Hamas and flawed language
By Ramzy Baroud
Online Journal Contributing Writer
May 11, 2009, 00:18
From a distance, the struggle between Hamas and Fatah
appears commonplace, a typical Third World country’s political scuffle over
interpretation of democracy that went out of control, or simply a ‘power
struggle’ between two political rivals vying for international aid and
recognition. In fact, the conflict may appear as if it popped out of nowhere
and will continue as long as the seemingly power-hungry Palestinians carry on
with their self-defeating fight.
Therefore, it’s typical to read such deceptive news reports
as that of Ibrahim Barzak of the Associated Press: “Hundreds of Palestinian
patients have been trapped in the Gaza Strip, unable to travel abroad for
crucial treatment for cancer and other diseases, because of political
infighting between Gaza’s militant Hamas rulers and their Palestinian rivals.”
Such sinister terminology as “Gaza’s Hamas rulers” -- which
happened to refer to a democratically elected government -- is now in common
use, in most Western news agencies, and those who readily recycle their
reports.
Barzak makes no mention of the Israeli factor in the decried
Palestinian rivalries, and the only reference to the US in his report was that of the
“U.S.-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, which controls the West Bank.”
Is Barzak serious? Even if we willingly overlook the fact
that Palestinian rivalry has little influence on Israel’s decision to block the
Gaza borders, thus subjugate its inhabitants, and purposely disregarded the
US-led international campaign to isolate Gaza and its government, how can one
allow such a misreading of so obvious a fact: since when does Abbas “control”
the West Bank? What should one make of the Israeli military occupation of
several decades, the hundreds of illegal Jewish settlements, the countless checkpoints,
‘bypass roads,’ numerous ‘military zones’ and the giant Israeli wall, an entire
matrix of control, in fact, which has been described by many leading
international observers as “apartheid”?
True, the situation in Gaza
has reached such harrowing levels, that the injustices committed in the West Bank are being relegated as if non-consequential.
But the fact is, the Israeli assault on Palestinian freedom, human rights and
international law in the West Bank never ceased for a moment, even when thousands
of Palestinians in Gaza were being brutally murdered.
But neither the inhumane siege and murder of Gazans, nor the
suffocating occupation -- with all of its lethal and non-lethal manifestations
-- of the West Bank seem to awaken the
curiosity of many, who foolishly, or cunningly blame the victim for his own
misery.
Of course that shouldn’t mean that Hamas and Fatah, or any
other Palestinian party should be absolved from their own missteps, such as
violations of human rights, infringement on freedom of speech or any other
aspect of which they possess even if an iota of control. If individuals from
Hamas violated human rights in Gaza,
then such actions should be recognized, condemned and corrected. The same is
true when Abbas’ government continues to violate the edicts of democracy in
whatever limited jurisdiction it has; that too must be recognized and duly
censured. But for the media to make such outrageous claims, whether indirectly
blaming Hamas for the deadly Gaza siege -- and its consequences -- or haphazardly
granted Abbas a position of ‘control’ over the occupied West Bank, is certainly
contemptible.
The manipulation of the term “democracy” is also worthy of
mentioning. An unsuspected media consumer would never guess that Hamas was
elected democratically, and that a democratic government with a majority in the
parliament cannot possibly stage a ‘coup’ against itself.
That same reader would find it hard to believe that the
legal term in office of celebrated President of the Palestinian Authority Mahmoud
Abbas has already expired, and its renewal would require re-election or the
consent of the Hamas-dominated parliament.
President Abbas, however, is reportedly assembling a new
government, which is expected to, once again, exclude the majority party in the
parliament
The government, if formed, will likely to be headed by Salam
Fayyad, whose international prestige stems solely from the fact that top US
officials, including former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, have praised
him as trustworthy. Fayyad was never elected and is little popular among
Palestinians.
More, even if Hamas agrees to Abbas’ appointed government,
it would be impossible for the parliament to convene and vote, for a large
number of elected Palestinian legislators are political prisoners in Israel. That also
seems too trivial a context to mention.
When a story is dominated by selective terminology, numbers,
names and dates without proper and balanced context, a media consumer is sold
nothing but misinformation.
Consider, for example, the report of the Economist
Intelligence Unit (EIU), published in late 2008, which ranked and classified
167 countries based on various democratic indicators into four categories: full
democracies, flawed democracies, hybrid regimes and authoritarian regimes. The
Palestinian Authority was ranked number 85, digressing from flawed democracy
into hybrid regime category. The explanation? According to the report: “The
Islamist Hamas movement that won the parliamentary election in early 2006, and
Fatah, which holds on to the presidency, have failed to bridge their
differences. Instead, factional infighting has worsened in recent years,
culminating in the takeover of power in the Gaza Strip by Hamas while the
Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, of Fatah has tried to maintain his grip
on the West Bank. Political violence has
worsened.”
The word, “Israel,” was not mentioned. Not once.
Despite the fact that “factional fighting,” and failure to
“bridge their differences” are largely attributed to external pressures (for
example, Israeli and American ultimatums to Abbas, violence against Hamas, and
conditional international aid to both), Palestinians are ranked as an
independent nation in complete control of their own affairs. Meanwhile, Israel was
ranked number 38, merely a “flawed’ democracy, perhaps for the sheer fact that
it recognizes itself as a “Jewish state” and discriminates against anyone who
doesn’t fit the criteria.
“If you control the language, you control the debate,” it’s
often said. But when the perception of an entire nation depends on how terms
are coined and sentences are constructed, then language takes on other
meanings, deceptive, demonizing and immoral.
Ramzy Baroud is an author and
editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His work has been published in many
newspapers and journals worldwide. His latest book is The
Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People’s
Struggle
(Pluto Press, London,) and his
forthcoming book is, “My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza The Untold Story”
(Pluto Press, London).
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor