Fleeting prosperity, courtesy of our grandchildren
By Ben Tanosborn
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Nov 18, 2008, 00:22
Why, we ask ourselves, do so many world leaders continue to
pay homage, no matter how subdued, to this American government that has served the
people of this planet so poorly as both conservator of resources and as
defender of human life and dignity?
Can anybody make sense in accepting George W. Bush as the
pied piper leading the way to the convocation of an emergency economic summit
of G20 Leaders hoping to cope with, and ameliorate, the meltdown now appearing
in the global economy? Never mind that the Bush administration bears much of
the responsibility for such meltdown!
Welcome to Washington, see of military and economic might! Welcome
to the Basilica of the Two Altars: Capitalism and Democracy, with Bungling Bush
as Supreme Pontiff. The inseparability of capitalism and democracy has come to
be in America an act of faith, at least for two generations, under the constant
brainwashing of both government and business, something that continuously
travels from the ridiculous to the sublime as democracy becomes conspicuous by
its absence -- in politics -- and capitalism shows its predatory and inhumane
face, nothing resembling the clean and smooth features we associate with true
free enterprise.
Bailouts and stimuli have been the magic potions carried in
the conversations of all these folks coming to Bush’s shindig, all present for
little more than a photo-op . . . since there was never a chance that guests to
the High Mass at the Basilica could convince the High Priest that regulations,
adequately enforced, are the only way to keep capitalism honest and
manageable. Too late for the current crash for, after all, this incredible
excuse for a world leader will be put to pasture in two months. Just why did
all these leaders accede to come to Washington when all they needed to do was
decide on a meeting place where they could all meet in February with young
Obama?!
Perhaps a return to the Azores . . . was suggested by a
Spanish journalist friend; but this time to promote world peace and meaningful
economic remedies in contrast to the March 16, 2003, performance of the 2½
Tenors (Bush, Blair and Aznar) -- my friend always thought of the then Spanish
head of state as half-baked -- and their strident “Ultimatum to Saddam” aria
sang as a battle cry to invade a sovereign nation: Iraq.
One might have expected some acrimony at this meeting,
particularly from Britain’s Brown or France’s Sarkozy; after all, we flooded
their countries, as well as many others, with our worthless paper but they’ll
get their chance to upstage Obama, or at least try, after he takes the reins. Of
course, the US is not entirely to blame for their economies’ meltdown; they did
a creditable job imitating us in many capitalist pyramid schemes.
As I stated six weeks ago, as Secretary Paulson delivered
his economic bad tidings asking for a rescue package “or we were all going to
drown,” the decision could have waited until such time as people, not just
Congress, were told in a clear manner both truth and consequences . . . something
which wasn’t done. And, to date, that truth has not been provided by our
government, nor does it appear that it will soon be; not before our national
debt reaches a level as high as the nation’s annual GDP (Gross Domestic
Product), or even past that point; and by then it will be too late, with more
than 80 percent of Americans, politically clueless and with little if any
wealth left, caged in economic captivity to predatory Corporate America. Why
the truth now? So we may accept a 20 or 30 percent cut in a standard of living
that was never ours by right, and accept it as a clean start; perhaps after
criminally indicting those who contributed to get us where we are today. Cancel
all the stupid reality shows on television and broadcast instead the biggest
reality show where we are all cast; instill some measure of civic education and
common sense, while ceasing to treat citizens as imbecilic consumers.
As for Detroit’s problem and a requested second $25 billion
bailout installment of, one guesses, many more to come, politicians -- in this
case Obama and Congress -- should do one of two things: let the Midget-3
deservedly go under, or purchase all outstanding stock in GM, Ford and Chrysler
at a fraction of the current price; then, offer to sell it to the employees
under some plan that would seem viable, permitting the continuance of
manufacturing autos in America. Stockholders and management have failed
miserably, why not now give a chance to labor? Unfortunately, either of these
two unpalatable choices has too great a political risk for both the president-elect
and the congressional Democrats. So, once again, our government will screw up .
. . and the taxpayers will end up paying the freight for another ticket to
nowhere.
What seems out of place, totally absurd, is for Bush, smile
on his face, to continue touting a totally opaque and thieving economic system,
ringing out the twin bells of capitalism and democracy. And to think, he does
so with impunity, and without any reasonable challenge!
For now, let’s thank our grandchildren for having gifted us
with this undeserved round of prosperity we have indulged in during these last
few years. Our legacy doesn’t seem to be much better than Bush’s, does it?
© 2008 Ben Tanosborn
Ben
Tanosborn, columnist, poet and writer, resides in Vancouver, Washington (USA),
where he is principal of a business consulting firm. Contact him at ben@tanosborn.com.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor