Goodbye to the city upon a hill and to its fabled economy
By Paul Craig Roberts
Online Journal Guest Writer
Jun 25, 2007, 00:51
“We shall be as a city upon a hill. The
eyes of all people are upon us.” --John Winthrop
America is being destroyed. Many Americans are unaware,
others are indifferent, and some intend it.
The destruction is across the board: the political and
constitutional system, the economy, social institutions including the family
itself, citizenship, and the character and morality of the American people.
Those who rely on the Internet for information are aware
that the Bush regime has successfully assaulted the separation of powers and
civil liberty. Both Bush and Cheney claim that they are not bound by laws that
impinge on their freedom of action or that interfere with their ideas of the
power of their offices. Bush has issued presidential directives that permit him
to make himself a dictator by declaring a national emergency. Cheney asserts that
his handling of secret documents is not subject to oversight or investigation
or bound by a presidential order governing the protection of classified
information.
The foundation of social organization -- marriage, family,
and parental control over children -- is disintegrating.
Mass unassimilated and illegal immigration has destroyed the
meaning of American citizenship and forced large numbers of Americans into
unemployment. For example, Steve Camarota at the Center for Immigration Studies
reported on June 20 that state employment data show that in the first six years
of the 21st century 218,000 high school graduates in the state of Georgia have
been employment- displaced by immigrants. [Employment Down
Among Natives In Georgia] Moreover, wages have stagnated, putting the
lie to the claim that there is a shortage of workers. If there were a labor
shortage, wages would be bid up and rising.
Many Americans are unconcerned that the US government in
behalf of an undeclared agenda has invaded two countries, killed hundreds of
thousands of foreign civilians, produced 4 million Iraqi refugees, rejected the
Geneva Conventions and reverted to medieval torture dungeons. It does not
trouble them that their government blocked ceasefires and UN resolutions so
that Israel could bomb and murder Lebanese civilians and destroy the country’s
infrastructure.
Americans, whose ethical behavior toward others was once
reinforced by having to look oneself in the mirror, now have a different ethos.
Many cannot look themselves in the mirror unless they have pulled a fast one
and advanced themselves at someone else’s expense. It is not only crooked
prosecutors, such as Michael
Nifong, who get
their jollies from destroying their
fellow citizens.
A Google search will call up enough information to make the
case for these points many times over. However, the destruction of the US
economy, though far advanced, is still largely unknown. It is to this subject
that we turn.
For a number of years Charles McMillion of MBG Information
Services and I have documented from BLS nonfarm payroll jobs data that the US
economy in the 21st century no longer creates net new jobs in tradable goods
and services. In the 21st century, job growth in “the world’s only superpower”
has a definite third world flavor. US job growth has been limited to domestic
services that cannot be moved offshore, such as waitresses and bartenders and
health and social services.
These are not jobs that comprise ladders of upward mobility.
Income inequality is worsening, and education is no longer the answer.
The problem is that middle class jobs, both in manufacturing
and in professional occupations such as engineering, are being offshored as
corporations replace their American workforces with foreigners. I have called
jobs offshoring “virtual
immigration.”
The latest bombshell is that even those professional jobs
that remain located in America are not safe. There is a vast industry of
immigration law firms that enable American corporations to replace their
American workers with foreigners brought in on work visas.
For years Americans have been told that work visas are only
issued in cases where there are no Americans with the necessary skills to fill
the jobs. Americans have been reassured that safeguards are in place to prevent
US companies from using the work visas to replace their American employees with
foreigners paid below the prevailing US wage. Now, thanks to a video placed on
“YouTube” by a US law firm, Cohen &
Grigsby, marketing its services, we now know that it is easy for US
companies to legally evade the “safeguards” and to replace their American
employees with lower paid foreigners.
The video shows Lawrence Lebowitz, [send him mail] vice president for Marketing for
the law firm of Cohen & Grigsby, together with a panel of the law firm’s
attorneys, explaining to an audience of employers how to use loopholes in the
laws governing the work visas to hire foreign workers in place of Americans.
Lebowitz says, “our
goal is clearly, not to find a qualified and interested US worker.”
Cohen & Grigsby’s legal experts describe the strategy
for ensuring that no American firm has to hire an American. The advertising
requirements can be met by advertising the job in obscure or ethnic newspapers
in locations where there are no likely job candidates. If a qualified American
candidate turns up, “have the manager of that specific position step in and . .
. go through the whole process to find a legal basis to disqualify them for
this position -- in most cases there doesn’t seem to be a problem.”
The “prevailing wage” requirement is evaded, for example, by
making the offered salary and raises contingent on receipt of the green card,
usually three or four years away, or by disguising the job by understating the
job requirements. For example, a job requiring an advanced degree can be listed
as requiring a bachelor’s degree, but filled with a foreigner with a higher
degree. As the higher degree is not listed as a job requirement, the employer
is able to secure the foreign employee below the prevailing wage.
University of California computer science professor Norman
Matloff has an excellent presentation available at his online site about the
lack of impediments to the ability of US firms to replace their American
employees with foreigners. Matloff says to keep in mind that Cohen &
Grigsby “is
NOT a rogue law firm.” The advice provided by Cohen & Grigsby is the
standard advice given by the hoards of immigration attorneys who are personally
cleaning up by putting Americans out of work.
Except for Lou Dobbs on CNN, the US TV and print media have
so far ignored the astounding story. Where are the headlines: “US Jobs: No
American Need Apply”?
Chances are high that economists will ignore the story also.
Economists have made fools of themselves with their hyped claims that jobs
offshoring is a great benefit to America and that any attempt to stop it would
bring hardship, failed companies, and lost American jobs. When a profession
gets egg all over its face, it closes ranks and goes into denial.
Unlike the post-depression generation of US economists,
recent generations of economists have been indoctrinated with confidence in
business. They believe that business knows best and that the free market will
prevent or correct any mistakes. Many economists today are well-paid shills for
special interests. Others, simply careless, have assumed that statistical
measures of high rates of US productivity and GDP growth were indications of
the benefits that offshoring was bringing to Americans.
Only a few economists, such as myself and Charles McMillion,
noticed the inconsistency between alleged high rates of productivity and GDP
growth on one hand and stagnant real median incomes and rising income
inequality on the other. Somehow the US economy was having GDP and productivity
growth that was not showing up in growth in the incomes of Americans.
Thanks to economist Susan N. Houseman and the
March 22 issue of Business Week, we now know, as I
reported in the print edition of CounterPunch (June 1-15, 2007) and online at VDARE.com
and Online
Journal, that much of the growth in US productivity and GDP was an illusion
created by statistics that mistakenly attributed productivity gains achieved
abroad to the US economy.
With the ladders of upward mobility for Americans dismantled
by offshoring and work visas, with the very real problems in mortgage and
housing markets, with the very real stress put on the US dollar’s reserve
currency role by Bush’s trillion dollar war that is financed by foreigners,
with the downward revisions in US GDP and productivity growth that are now
mandatory, and with a variety of other problems that I haven’t the space to
deal with, the fabled US economy is a thing of the past.
Just like America’s prestige. Just like the world’s goodwill
toward America. Just like American liberty.
The eyes of all peoples are still upon us, only for
different reasons. Whom will we attack next? When will we be bankrupt? What
good is the American consumer market when the mass of the people are employed
in third world jobs? How much longer will those trillions of dollars held by
foreign governments be worth anything? How long before Americans will be
knocking on European doors claiming political asylum?
Paul
Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the
Reagan Administration. He is the author of Supply-Side
Revolution : An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation
and the Soviet Economy and Meltdown:
Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the
co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The
Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the
Constitution in the Name of Justice. Click here for Peter
Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts about the recent epidemic of
prosecutorial misconduct.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor