If some of us
aren’t expressing it, we’re at least privately questioning the breakdown in
federal and state law and the failure of leading officials to restore
accountability to a system designed to represent, at least on the surface, a
majority of its people. We’re flabbergasted that politicians of Faustian
proportion could disrupt our checks and balances as effectively as they do and
are just as astounded at the range of criminal activity within our federal,
state and local governments. We’re even more dismayed at the public’s limp
reaction to this usurpation of power.
Personally, I don’t
know which devil to admonish the most: Washington or my own neighbor, for both
are guilty for what has happened to our lives, laws and Constitution. We’ve
allowed our leaders unlimited dips into the national well and have done little
to pay closer heed to history’s lessons. As a result, the rich have gone on to
enjoy unthinkable profits while the rest of us have been left behind with fewer
benefits, protections and freedoms.
All of this
intrusion into our private lives could possibly been avoided had we been on the
lookout for two particular elements: first, the laying down of a national
consciousness and second, the intrusion of that most troubling emotion: fear.
Thoreau, and not Roosevelt, first wrote about the poisonous state of fear
without adequately explaining its daunting effect on our lives. I can suggest
however, that the less educated and informed a public is the more easily
manipulated it becomes. Conversely, while many of us are aware of the
psychological unraveling that takes place when education is put on hold and
fear raised to its highest level, we should likewise be prepared to take up the
battle against fear and its accompaniment: propaganda.
It’s baffling how
certain Machiavellian maneuvers, such as the illegal invasion of another
country, the illegal use of presidential powers, the illegal tampering with
voting machines and the violation of human rights, to mention a few, can
silence a democracy and derail its checks and balances.
Whenever I’m in the
presence of those still in denial about this country’s attacks upon itself, I
often lose my audience before I can finish my first words. I’m often conscious
of my tone and usually go out of my way to lighten my message. It still doesn’t
make much difference since my “audience” generally refuses to hear, probably
because their government doesn’t want them to hear. That being the case, my
running declaration of indictments won’t do much to change their minds anytime
soon, regardless of my approach.
Frankly, I don’t
believe certain groups of people want their minds changed. I, on the other
hand, find it incredulous that I’m even writing about these blemished and
intrusive times. I also find it incredulous that our country has lost its moral
center. I find it incredulous that we’ve lost our free press, an independent
judiciary and an inspired leadership -- all in one Halliburton swoop. I find it
incredulous that after 230 years we’re still a country devoid of enlightenment
and lacking in reason and moral judgment. If ever we had an American
Renaissance or a commitment to a true national education, then the likes of a
Cheney, Rumsfeld or Bush could not have made it to the front stage.
Fortunately, the
real weapon against abusive power is not the military or any overt form of
aggression but rather the power of the mind to see clearly the infractions that
cancel and eradicate our freedoms. This power calls upon us to put aside our
own shortcomings and exert a universal willingness to defend that morality
which already exists in the human psyche as well as in nature.
Men and women
consumed with power have no knowledge of the labor that goes into the building
of a national conscience. Those who control the comings and goings of today’s
power lack, through their own improper conduct, a trusting conscience. To their
credit and that of their predecessors, whatever grit and compassion that were
once a part of the national work force have now been removed. Our salvation,
therefore, must be to pull ourselves up by our own bootstraps and turn history
on its side. Only through unified and conscientious actions can a new door open
and allow us to rebuild from a position of knowledge. In the end only
enlightenment and reason can ensure a truer and more lasting democracy.
Whatever support
system we had to preserve our views and freedoms has been craftily dissembled .
. . but not while America slept. No, America was definitely not asleep. This
time around its mind was shut while its eyes were open with instructions from
the top levels of government blurring most clear vision. It was also during
this time that Washington’s money-changers -- its congressional representatives
-- benefited heftily through favors and tradeoffs while the majority of its
constituents moped quietly behind . . . but awake. And they’re still awake. The
difference now is they’re being asked to see through a different pair of eyes.
In defense of the
American citizenry, however, (and one can make an arguable defense) it has some
most formidable opponents in Congress and Corporate America. As much as this administration
lacks in polish and sophistication, when it comes to exploiting fear and
propaganda, certain key players have learned their history very well. What we,
the average citizen, essentially did was to allow oil and power to remain in
the hands of crafty manipulators while our common sense was placed on hold.
Although those at the helm may tell a different story, the truth is that what
began with the Rockefeller crowd over 100 years ago has escalated into an
irreversible contest for oil and world domination today.
Because I consider
myself one who still views the world with his own pair of eyes, I can’t stop
voicing the questions I raised five years ago: How did they get elected and why
are they still here? How is it that the majority of us are still behaving as
though there’s no recourse to what could be considered impeachable offenses?
I think the answers
may not be that elusive and that what makes us feel so stressed is that we’re
in too much denial. I have a hunch that the majority of us don’t think about
what we should be thinking about most of the time. Instead it’s all about what
and how our leaders and, of course, the press instruct us. It’s about political
persuasion and how the public, when caught between tragedy and patriotism, will
stand behind the flag first as it did four years ago and will do 300 years
hence. Karl Rove knows this. Richard B. Cheney certainly knew this. Anyone
connected with the Carlyle Group and G.W. have always known this. Then why is
it the rest of us don’t?
It’s safe to say
this government isn’t much different from the one we had at the turn of the
century. This group is simply better at pooling its resources and molding a
public to perform unconditionally at the first command of its leader. A public
should be aware of how power and greed direct the workings of its government.
However, the plain truth is that most people aren’t that circumspect.
My mother once had
an expression that she used on her children when events would turn against her.
“You can’t fight City Hall,” she would utter at least once a month. It was the
other 29 days that I used for querying: “Why -- why can’t you fight City Hall?”
And I’m still
asking, although I’m keenly aware that the deception which began with the first
Rockefeller is very much alive and well in the current House of Oil. I’m also
aware that if I had spent an hour a day watching what most folks view on
television, then I would probably have gone from stressed to jittery by now.
The same would hold true had I eagerly followed politics, especially this administration’s
politics. I’m further convinced that had I forced myself to study every
mispronunciation, to listen to every disjointed comment of a national leader
whose character has led to the lowering of educational, professional and
business standards, then I would certainly have gone from jittery to thoroughly
strained by now.
But the truth is
I’m not following CNN, CBS and G-d help us all, Fox Entertainment. The hours
saved have gone to other beneficial uses, such as studying the dioxins in the
air and reading up on the global warming that G.W denies. It’s also afforded me
the opportunity to seek out other individuals who are willing to speak openly
and frankly about issues that concern them, subjects over which we might
liberally agree. With them, with this circle of friends, I can think aloud and
ponder true conservative subjects
like health, job security, pentagon waste, White House waste, balanced budgets
and government interference. In the presence of their camaraderie I can also
hope that the FBI won’t be overly zealous any time soon about breaking down my door.
I’ve always thought
myself a liberal, and because of the mockery Reagan made of that now infamous
word, it isn’t inconceivable for me to imagine the FBI forcing its way through
my front door. Yet a party that falsifies an economy, ignores an unforgivable
deficit, reinvents the Constitution, turns evolution on its backside and a
country’s open spaces into a wasteland, should have more problems than I do.
That’s the party that should be looking over its shoulder. They’re the ones who
should be feeling the stress. Not me.
But they’re not.
Instead they’re making people I care about more anxious by not giving them the
news to which they’re entitled -- news that reflects accurate investigative
reporting. Most of what we hear is either about the “democratization” of Iraq,
the “upholding” of our Constitution, the constant legislating of give-a-way
programs to the Far Right, Gas & Oil and Timber & Forestry Industries
and the “vision” our infamous leader has for “protecting” our Freedoms.
Yet, if a fraction
of the “real” news actually leaked out and reached the ears of some of the
public, would conditions be different? Possibly, but probably not, at least not
until we start opening our minds.
As for me, I need
to hear a truth which appears to have hit rock bottom. I need to see Justice
out in the open and not just occasionally squeezed between the thousand
heartbreaks and defeats. I need to see it enacted in the courtroom in my
hometown, New Orleans, and I want to see the full scoop reported in the
Times-Picayune and every Picayune from here to Washington. I want to see an
immediate halt to protecting millionaire politicians. I want to see the buck
stop somewhere safe and go toward feeding hungry mouths. I want to see it
judiciously directed away from the Michael Chertoffs and all future Michael
Chertoffs yet to come.
What’s more, I
don’t need ABC, NBC or NPR or anyone else to remind me of the silliness of our
newscasting when it reports how the economy appears to be “running” on course
or how “stabilization” is spreading throughout the Far East. I thought that’s
what those sexy magazine tabloids at the checkout lines were all about.
Besides, isn’t Tom Cruise more important than finding bin Laden? Isn’t LSU or
Florida State football more important than finding bin Laden? One would think
so since no one wants to mention bin Laden. But our media has no problem
talking or writing about football and Tom Cruise 24/7. Now why is that?
Furthermore, I
don’t wish to hear only what my government wants me to hear about war or be the
butt of their jocularity as they sit around the Oval Office playing with
sophomoric words like Homeland Security and Weapons of Mass Destruction and
expect me not to gasp at the simplicity of it all. Incredibly, every comical
word and term this administration has dreamt up has found its way in to print.
They knew that the rest of us would be waiting for any forthcoming “news” since
we usually accept all news as gospel. They also knew that unless we swallowed
every syllable and paragraph then we’d run the risk of the unThinkable; we’d
all be called unAmerican and unPatriotic. G-d, forbid!
A government built
on fear is one that is to be feared and eventually to be removed. If not, a
government that feeds off the confusion of its own people will only result in
the gradual eroding of everyone else’s civil liberties and an increase in the
anxiety felt in docile, democratic circles.
I don’t think
there’s any question that the fear factor has been raised. The question is why
and for how long. For the moment, though, just pause and look into everyone’s
eyes. Listen to their words. These are not the happy faces I saw during the
Clinton years. At least then we were talking about halting the proliferation of
guns and nuclear weapons. Now it’s assumed that everyone who doesn’t pack a weapon
may need therapy or counseling or some serious schooling regarding our misread
second amendment.
Years ago there
were no bumbling speeches from important leaders who would deliberately involve
us in preemptive war. Only a decade ago we were setting aside public lands for
our children and actually planning to preserve a heritage. Today it’s not
heritage we live with, but fear; fear of our government, fear of our employer
and even fear of the people next door.
It’s also fear that
has since separated me from those with whom I occasionally meet casually. It’s
fear that has separated me from those who believe America’s role should be that
of the aggressor . . . and I don’t. It’s fear that has separated me from those
who believe it’s America’s role to dismantle social programs . . . and I don’t.
It’s fear that has taught others to disrespect their own states’ rights and
civil liberties . . . and I don’t.
I’ve also observed
invisible and not so invisible walls going up that will take some time to
lower. Frankly, I can’t see mine coming down anytime soon. Nor do I believe I
would want them to; that is not until some very simple words like Health,
Liberty, Democracy and Constitution are taken back into our lives and those
precious walls of Justice and Freedom are protected, preserved and put in place
once again.
But until that day
arrives, I intend to stay a bit closer to home and a bit closer to others I
choose to trust. Whatever goes awry outside of my circle, I still might have
some control. If it goes too far, if the talk gets too loud or unfriendly, I’ll
still try to listen although I’ll probably not agree. And if it makes any
difference, I won’t shut the doors until I’m forced to. However, there’s one
point I can guarantee and that is I won’t change or reverse my thinking just to
make others or a few grumbling neighbors happy.
If I did that I really wouldn’t be American, now
would I?