It’s not just
Cheney, the Gang Vice-Capo, who can’t shoot straight, sweeping his rifle to the
right and down, following a covey of quail, and shooting instead his “friend”
Harry Whittington with a chest, neck and face full of birdshot.
How straight a
shooter was Katherine Armstrong, hostess of the hunting event on her
50,000-acre Texas ranch, who swore the ritual was absolutely alcohol-free, solo
Dr. Pepper, while Cheney later confessed he’d had “a beer” for lunch, just one,
no more; right, Dick, the check is in the mail.
And how
straight-shooting was the White House that tried to ignore the story until
hours after it was broken by Ms. Armstrong to the Corpus Christi Caller-Times as opposed to, say, the Washington Post, New York Times, LA Times,
Chicago Tribune, or any other of America’s major papers? People might want
to know if the VP was shooting people.
And how straight a
shooter was Scott McClellan when he first told America that President Bush had
been notified of the shooting an hour after it happened, at 8 PM that Sunday
night, when in fact the event occurred at 5:30 PM that Sunday, according to Ms
Armstrong.
But the white and
darker lies, the obfuscation, the illegalities, Cheney not having an upland
hunting stamp, violating the hunter’s code to hold fire in a situation like
that, to avoid all alcohol while hunting, are the tip of the iceberg for The Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight.
The title in fact
is borrowed from Jimmy Breslin’s novel about a whacked and whacking Mafia
family and their gang that are as stupid and incompetent as they are brutally
violent. In the book and movie made from it with Robert DeNiro, it’s all darkly
funny.
In real life, it’s
not so funny. It’s a roaring pain in the head to know this gang sits at the
helm of the not so free world, pointing missiles today at Iran, bunker busters
yesterday at Iraq, and an Army at Afghanistan, managing to miss Osama bin
Laden, the so-called 9/11 perp, but level what remained of the country.
Couldn’t Shoot Straight About Enron, #1 Bush
Contributor
And speaking of The Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight,
these past weeks we’ve been introduced to the Enron trial and fellow Bush gang
members, Kenny Boy Lay and Jeffrey Skilling, who couldn’t be straight shooters
about their earnings, on and off the books, including shell companies used for
hiding monies or, when often empty, being declared as assets or liabilities for
earnings or tax reasons, as the Cayman Island winds blew.
Their lack of straight-shooting
practically bankrupted the state of California with energy price gouging in
2001. Then too, the Enron plunge to bankruptcy took with it, like the Titanic,
thousands of innocents, employees, their retirement plans and jobs. This while
Kenny and fellow sharks sold off huge amounts of private stock, hyping prices
with inflated earnings reports to Wall Street, fully knowing the stock would
tank. It would seem Bush’s largest campaign contributor was a paradigm of
corporate crookedness.
Lastly, Enron’s
White House meetings with Bush and Cheney in April 2001, discussing the
California crisis, have still not been fully explained, in defiance of
congressional demands for full disclosure. What are they hiding, still?
Couldn’t Shoot Straight About Iraq
Our Capo de Capos,
President Bush, Vice-Capo Cheney, Consigliare Rove, Capo of State Rice, Capos
Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and Powell, and Solders and Button Men Feith, Libby,
Armitage, et al, definitely could not, would not shoot straight about Iraq and
Weapons of Mass Destruction. The lies were pounded like drums that Saddam had
tried to buy yellow-cake uranium from Niger; that Saddam was about to use these
non-existent weapons, and that we must attack him alone, unilaterally,
preemptively, immediately in order to survive.
In fact, how
straight a shooter was Scooter Libby, who outed Valerie Plame as a CIA covert
agent because her hubby, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, outed the yellow-cake
uranium from Niger myth as a complete lie? Though now it seems the word to leak
Plame’s identity came down from Libby’s Capo, Cheney.
And so, after
dragging us into the war, and declaring it over on May 1, 2003, could they
shoot straight about what it took to really win or bring about a durable peace?
No. Undermanned,
under-planned, undermined by a rush to kill, maim and grasp Iraqi’s oil, we
were brought to the present disaster, Iraq today: thousands of American
soldiers killed, untold thousands of Iraqis, mostly civilians, killed, and the
conflagration raging, even after a bogus election to simulate a virtual
democracy, which is as stable as the levees of New Orleans, another disaster in
which no one could shoot straight, talk straight, act straight, to prevent the
destruction of a great American city and the copious loss of lives of its
citizens, black and white.
Couldn’t Shoot Straight About New Orleans or
9/11
Speaking of New
Orleans, let us go back to that other domestic disaster of 9/11. It’s amazing
how no one could shoot straight that day, how hordes of American military
fighters were not available to stop the airliner-missiles from smacking the
World Trade Center or the Pentagon.
Yet now we can see
clearly in DVDs like loosechange.com
the Towers’ explosions occurring at their tops and moving downwards
followed by massive explosions at the bases of Towers One and Two. The
combinations of explosions brought each tower down in 10 seconds -- free fall
at the speed of gravity.
That’s truth, not
the myth that redundant steel-frame buildings “melted” from jet fuel fires,
which burned away in minutes. The heat and time a melt would take was far
beyond the half-an-hour and hour-and-a-half before the South then North Towers
fell.
Couldn’t Shoot Straight About Tower 7
And we are told
Tower 7 was “pulled” eight hours later; demolished at the behest of owner, WTC
lessee Larry Silverstein. In fact, the-no-straight-shooter Silverstein
neglected to mention it takes weeks, sometimes months, to set up a building
that size for demolition. So Capo Larry, when are you going to take the
billions you made on your Towers’ insurance, which benefits you ratcheted up
only a month before 9/11, and when are you actually going to build something?
C’mon, Larry, try to be a straight-shooter just once.
Couldn’t Shoot Straight about the Pentagon
Hit
But perhaps that’s
all history, like the missile that hit the Pentagon, not a 757, because no 757
fuselage was found, no 124-foot wide wings, 40-foot high tail, or massive
engines found. Only an 18-foot wide entrance hole, and an eight-foot wide exit
hole from ring C. Oh yes, and a rotor from an Allyson Turbofan jet engine, much
smaller, used for the Global Hawk craft that carried the missile that exploded
on impact right through three rings of the Pentagon. What’s more, actual video
tapes recordings of the hit from a nearby gas station and hotel, were seized by
the FBI and never shown. Shoot straight, guys. Show them.
Couldn’t Shoot Straight About Flight 93
You’ve probably
heard it all, including the chestnut from that loosechange.com DVD that Flight
F 93 did not crash or get blown up over or in the fields of southern Pennsylvania
(even as I thought originally) but landed in a Cleveland airport and its
passengers were evacuated to a nearby NASA center. So it goes, truth is
stranger than fiction.
Couldn’t Shoot Straight About Superhighways
From Mexico To US
Also, let me give
you major pieces of new news about The
Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight and what they’re up to. Two
NAFTA Corridors Will Be Off-shoring Transportation Jobs to Mexico.
This startling info comes from a story by straight-shooter Richard Vogel in the
Monthly Review. You have to read this
linked tale. Basically, the plan is to build two NAFTA Superhighways with
side-by-side rail lines, converging and crossing the international border at
Laredo/Nuevo Laredo:
Although
I-5 and I-15 originating in Tijuana and serving the western states, I-19
connecting Nogales and Tucson, and I-10 that serves Ciudad Juárez/El Paso and
provides an essential east-west link in the system, are all important NAFTA
highways --the two priority segments of the NAFTA corridor system in the United
States are the I-35 Corridor and the proposed I-69 Corridor both of which will
originate in Laredo and carry NAFTA freight all the way to the American
Midwest. When the I-35 Corridor is completed it will extend 1,600 miles north
to the U.S./Canada border. Along the route it will serve San Antonio, Austin,
Dallas/Ft. Worth, Oklahoma City, Wichita, Kansas City, Des Moines,
Minneapolis/St. Paul, and Duluth. The proposed I-69 Corridor will also
originate in Laredo but will head northeast, serving Houston, Texarkana,
Memphis, Evansville, Indianapolis, and Lansing to the U.S./Canada border at
Port Huron, a total of approximately 2,100 miles. Promoters of the NAFTA
corridors tout the system as the largest engineering project ever undertaken in
U.S. history. What they fail to publicize, however, are the economic costs of
the system and how the massive project will alter the landscape and environment
of America forever. These undeclared consequences, however, will be calamitous
. . . [Be patient, read on]
Couldn’t Shoot Straight About Land
Consumption
The NAFTA corridors will be up to 1,200 feet wide with
separate lanes for passenger vehicles (three in each direction) sandwiched
between truck lanes (two in each direction). The corridors will also contain
six rail lines (three in each direction): two tracks for high-speed passenger
rail, two for commuter rail, and two for freight. The third component of the
corridor will be a 200-foot-wide utility zone. To accommodate the railways and
underground utilities, the corridors will run at grade level and will require
extensive bridging at crossovers and intersections. The current estimate is
that a typical corridor section will require 146 acres of right-of-way per
mile, making the anticipated land consumption for the NAFTA corridors 584,000
acres in Texas alone (For a detailed critique of the Trans Texas Corridor Plan
see corridorwatch.org). Total land consumption in the
United States for the NAFTA corridors could exceed 1 million acres. Since the
corridors are going to be routed through rural areas, this means they will
consume a total area of agricultural land and open spaces almost as large as
the land area of the state of Vermont.
Couldn’t Shoot
Straight About Outsourcing Transportation Jobs
Also, the two superhighways and rail system are designed to
break the back of organized labor in the containerization and trucking
industries located in the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. The idea is to
get Mexican drivers, loaders, et al, at the lowest prices in high unemployment
areas of Mexico to take the “off-shored” jobs of Americans, delivering the
China-and-other-bottom-cost-nations’ goods to Wal-Mart, Costco and others’
distribution centers in America. So goods would come from the container ports
in Mexico to retail outlets across the US.
Not only is the real estate it takes to build these two
passages enormous, so too is the enormity of pollution, noise, and general
damage to the American as well as Mexican environments. Both cultures will be
screwed but the Corporatos will profit. Have you heard any straight talk about
this from the Capo de Capos or the Gang? Nada, senores, signoras et senoritas.
Couldn’t Shoot
Straight About Dubai Managing American Ports
Big capital and the Big Gang are already working on offering
up six major US ports to a Dubai management firm with at least two ties to the
White House where the City Never Sleeps, Citi-Bank’s old theme line.
Reported by Michael McAuliffe in the good old New York Daily News on February 21, the
White House links are one to “Treasury Secretary John Snow, whose agency heads
the federal panel that signed off on the $6.8 billion sale of an English company
to government-owned Dubai Ports World -- giving it control of Manhattan's
cruise ship terminal and Newark's container port.
“Snow was chairman of the CSX rail firm that sold its own
international port operations to DP World for $1.15 billion in 2004, the year
after Snow left for Bush's cabinet.
“The other connection is David Sanborn, who runs DP World's
European and Latin American operations and was tapped by Bush last month to
head the U.S. Maritime Administration . . .
"The more you look at this deal, the more the deal is
called into question," said Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who said the deal
was rubber-stamped in advance -- even before DP World formally agreed to buy
London's P&O port company.
Besides operations in New York and Jersey, Dubai would also
run port facilities in Philadelphia, New Orleans, Baltimore and Miami . . ."
Okay, so there’s no straight-shooting there. They’re
outsourcing management of five American major ports? Why? Aren’t we smart
enough to do it ourselves?
Couldn’t Shoot
Straight About DU Killing US Soldiers
And here’s a biggy, folks, that The Gang Who Couldn’t Shoot Straight, extending back to Don GHW
Bush and fellow mobsters couldn’t be
straight about . . . From the Free Market News and Rense comes a major bomb
about the use of depleted uranium and its effects on our soldiers in the first
Gulf War: DU Scandal Explodes - Horrendous US Casualties. Here’s just a
shocking snippet from it:
But due to the use of depleted uranium in the
battlefield, 56 percent of the 580,400 solders that served in the first Gulf
War were on Permanent Medical Disability by 2000. 11,000 Gulf War veterans are
already dead. Now 518,739 Gulf War Veterans, almost all of them, are currently
on medical disability.
And on and on it goes. I guess they figure, what you don’t
know won’t hurt you. And what they make up will be good for you. That’s the
ethic in a handful of words. From the Gang That Just Couldn’t, Wouldn’t, Never
Ever, Shoot Straight. All the more reason for you to get it straight and shoot
straight, from here and at every other site still telling the truth, before
they start to disappear, like certain reporters, thanks to certain people.
Consider my advice, as Don Corleone would say, “An offer you can’t refuse.”
Jerry
Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York. Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net.