As most Americans are sitting down to eat that once noble native bird, the turkey, a growing number are observing a No Thanksgiving/Day of Sorrow to reflect on the genocide committed against the American Indians.

Eating the once noble turkey, nominated by that one intellectual giant amongst the founders of the USA, Benjamin Franklin, to be the national bird, has come to symbolize much of what is wrong about celebrating this bogus holiday.

The original turkey was a wily, respected bird, the successful stalking of which marked one as a skilled hunter. The fowl that most Americans will be stuffing themselves with this Thursday is raised in cages, being fed increasing amounts of genetically engineered grain, laced with antibiotics. It is so hyper-inbred, the male’s breast is so large females must be artificially inseminated. It would seem being too fat to have sex has now become another addition to the American tradition.

While the historical myth of American Indians peaceably sharing their turkey dinner with the white settlers on Thanksgiving is still taught as fact to our children, a review of the historical record shows no reference to this event ever happening.

Benjamin Franklin and the Founding Fathers of America didn’t celebrate this holiday. In fact, the Thanksgiving holiday was a public relations gimmick dreamed up by that corporate lawyer turned politician, Abraham Lincoln, during the darkest days of the Civil War in an attempt to win support for an increasingly unpopular war.

No, during Benjamin Franklin’s time, the white settlers were busy actually dealing with a militant, armed, united, well led and organized League of the Iroquois to be bothered pretending they were friends. One needs to look no further than the so called “King Phillips War” in the middle of the 17th century to find some of the most horrendous massacres, nay, genocide, committed against the “savage” Indian by the “god fearing Christians,” hardly the environment for celebrating holidays about friendly get-togethers.

Yet the nation empire founded by the legendary Hiawatha, the League of the Iroquois, occupied a considerable portion of Benjamin Franklin’s scholarly attention in his earlier years. As a printer, Franklin was in charge of the correspondence between the League of the Iroquois and the colonialists. He became such an authority on the American Indian that he was appointed to his first diplomatic post as commissioner of Indian Affairs and acted as ambassador to the League of the Iroquois for the colony of Pennsylvania.

Addressing the Albany Congress in 1754, Franklin called on the delegates from the English colonies to unite along the lines of the League of the Iroquois, something they were not to do until 30 years later.

Benjamin Franklin was also the author of the original, draft constitution of what would become the first “democracy” in the Western world, the USA. When looking for models for Franklin’s new “democracy” in European society, you find little in over 2,000 years of European history, having to go all the way back to the Roman and earlier Greek city states.

Yet if you look at Franklin’s neighbors, the League of the Iroquois, and their constitution, you find remarkable similarities with what Franklin envisioned in his constitution. What is this I am saying, that these “savage redskins” ran their society “democratically”? That these supposed “barbarians,” who oversaw an empire that stretched from New England to the Mississippi River, may have been the model for the first “democracy” in the Western world? This is something I doubt most Americans have even considered.

The League of the Iroquois was composed of nation “states” which had jurisdiction over affairs in that “state” only. Each “state” had its own elected legislature, which, as in Franklin’s constitution, chose a number of “electors” to the “federal” League of the Iroquois. These “electors” were accorded to each “state” based on the individual “state’s” population. The “electors” met regularly in a sacred hall for their deliberations.

This “grand council” (the name Franklin used in the original draft of the constitution (for what came to be the Congress of the USA) was unicameral, as was Franklin’s original white settler “council,” later Congress, of the former English colonies.

This Grand Council of the League of the Iroquois declared war and negotiated peace treaties, sent and received ambassadors, decided on new members joining the League and, in general, acted as a “federal” government whose decisions superseded those of the “states” in affairs of the “nation.”

As in Franklin’s constitution, in the League of the Iroquois, the electors could not be serving in the military while holding office. In both cases, an electorate chose the electors and could recall their choice at anytime. One of the main differences between the two “democracies” was that in the League of the Iroquois, the electors were reserved for men BUT ELECTED BY THE WOMEN. That’s right, in the League of the Iroquois, the women elected the leadership, something much more “democratic” than the actual minority of men who got to vote in the USA.

Franklin’s friend, Thomas Jefferson, was also a student of the American Indian. Jefferson was the first person to propose a systematic ethnological study of the American Indian, so as to “collect their traditions, laws, customs, languages and other circumstances.”

Yet the Founding Fathers of the USA displayed a savagery in destroying the League of the Iroquois as well as that other American Indian “democracy,” the Creek Confederation, that shocked even some of their peers.

That genocide, both good and ill intentioned, was carried out by Europeans against the American Indians is an undeniable fact. The question we must ask is “why did this happen?”

During the period of the most active genocide against American Indians, Slavery was king in America. And as long as Africans in slavery had a place to escape to, as well as base to launch retaliation from, no slave owner was safe. The threat represented by Indian/African unity resulted in the ruthless attacks on the League of the Iroquois, the Creek Confederation, and finally, the so-called “Seminole Wars” of the early 19th century.

Seminole is a Spanish corruption of an Indian word for “runaway” or “renegade.” The “Seminole Indians” were a mixture of escaped Africans and American Indians, mainly remnants of the Creek Confederation who had escaped to the Florida Everglades. The Seminoles, who were never defeated, fought the longest most expensive wars in American history, until that point.

The “Trail of Tears” death march, ended the last major resistance by American Indians east of the Mississippi River, and secured the institution of slavery in the south. Slavery was king and “the only good Indian was a dead Indian” became the slogan for much of what was policy in the USA.

With this in mind and with “Thanksgiving” once again upon us, it behooves all Americans of good will to take the time to reflect on your real history, to teach this to your children, and to stop “celebrating” this mythical holiday that represents so dark a period in the history of this country. Leave that poor turkey in peace, and join in observing a “No Thanksgiving/Day of Sorrow.”