Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Nov 3rd, 2009 - 00:46:59


Palestinians won’t be patient forever
By Linda S. Heard
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Nov 3, 2009, 00:18

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

There’s little good news in the West Bank and Gaza nowadays. But the long-suffering Palestinians are used to that.

The problem is there’s an increasing absence of hope, which is dangerous because without hope people begin to believe they’ve nothing to lose. This is why some commentators are predicting the inevitability of a third intifada. And despite denials from senior Palestinian officials, such as former Security Chief Mohammed Dahlan, a spontaneous uprising remains a very real possibility.

This is not due to Palestinians craving a return to armed protest. Indeed, most have painfully come to terms with Israel’s existence on what they consider as their historic homeland and are now ready to create a peaceful neighboring state.

Even Hamas has said it is ready to recognize a Jewish state based on pre-1967 borders. In August, Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal told the Wall Street Journal that all Palestinian factions are willing to embrace international peace initiatives “to find a just solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to end the Israeli occupation and to grant the Palestinian people their right to self-determination.”

The Palestinian people have been extraordinarily patient for more than six decades of humiliation, insecurity and subsistence. They’ve tried everything in their power to live normal lives like everyone else on the planet from appealing to the international community, counting on international laws and world bodies to peaceful protest and armed resistance. Theirs is a story of continuous letdowns. Their attempts to pursue their rights through recognized legal channels have always been blocked by big powers that are sycophantic to Israel and on those occasions that they have claimed their right to resist the occupier, they have been characterized as “terrorists.”

In recent times, they have also been let down by their own leaders, who seem more concerned with either prostrating themselves before Washington or arguing with one another rather than standing united against their common enemy. Yet, they somehow manage to soldier on fueled by an unshakable belief in their own convictions. But there are certain red lines which cannot be crossed.

They may have been beaten, bombed, besieged and imprisoned without serious retaliation but there is one thing they are not prepared to tolerate: disrespectful Israeli incursions into Islam’s third holiest mosque, Al-Aqsa. In fact, the second intifada -- also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada -- was triggered when Israel’s former hard-line prime minister, Ariel Sharon, entered the compound against all advice in 2000, accompanied by hundreds of armed men. It resulted in the death of up to 5,500 Palestinians and 1,000 Israelis.

It seems the Israelis have learned nothing from recent history. On Oct. 25, Israeli police in riot gear stormed the mosque with rubber bullets and stun grenades ostensibly to disperse stone-throwing protesters. This desecration comes hard on the heels of an Israeli ban on worshippers under 50-years-old being allowed to enter the Al-Aqsa compound, which devout Palestinians are determined to flout. And, according to the Jerusalem Post, it also compounds Palestinian fears that “extremist Jewish elements” plan to construct a synagogue close to the mosque as well as concerns that Israel is deliberately trying to weaken its foundations by allowing archaeological digs.

For once, Fatah and Hamas are on the same page. Israel’s incursion “violates every Muslim on the face of the earth,” said a representative of Hamas, who urges Arab leaders to sever ties with Israel. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas warns of “dangerous consequences” and urges Israel to refrain from further provocations.

Head of the Palestinian Supreme Judiciary Council Taysir Al-Tamimi called upon Palestinians to acknowledge Sunday, Oct. 25, and subsequent days as “Days of Rage for Jerusalem” and asked his compatriots to come together as one in order to protect the mosque.

Khaled Meshaal has replaced his softening attitude for one that is more militant. “The fate of Jerusalem will be determined only by confrontation and not by the negotiating table,” he said. “The Israelis want to divide Al-Aqsa Mosque, and this is not all. They want to hold their religious ceremonies in the mosque . . . in preparation for demolishing it and building their temple there.”

The Arab League is outraged but more moderate in its response. Secretary-General Amr Moussa has asked the United Nations Security Council to prevent such assaults and to declare Israel responsible for escalating tensions. Judging by the way the Goldstone report on Israel’s war crimes in Gaza has been virtually dismissed by the veto-holding superpower, his appeal will likely fall upon deaf ears.

When Muslims make up a quarter of the planet’s population it seems astonishing how little clout they wield collectively on the world stage. It is true that the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) that represents 57 Islamic nations has warned Israel to abstain from provocation else bear grave consequences, but it has failed to spell out what these might be.

A people struggling against occupation should not be left alone to protect a holy site that is beloved by all Muslims as the place from which the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)) ascended to Heaven. Leaders of every single Muslim country from Morocco to Indonesia should be pulling out all the diplomatic stops to persuade Security Council members to get tough with Israel to prevent bloodshed as well as the lid closing on any chance of peace.

Everything must be done to prevent a third intifada. The first and the second didn’t change the status quo, so why would a third? Moreover, the Palestinians are arguably worse off today than they ever were as every year that goes by Israel shrinks land needed for a viable Palestinian state with its apartheid “fence,” house demolitions, and unhindered settlement expansions.

A third intifada would achieve nothing except play right into the hands of Israel’s right-wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been under considerable pressure from the Obama White House to agree to permanent status talks without preconditions. He has managed to persuade President Barack Obama to drop his call for a settlement freeze but he won’t be able to keep peace talks at bay without a good excuse. Palestinians from all sides of the political spectrum must work together with the backing of the Muslim world to ensure he never gets it.

If Obama is committed to being deserving of his Nobel Peace Prize, he needs to strengthen his silvery tongue with a modicum of bite. He alone has the power to stop Israel in its tracks if only he can summon up the courage to use it.

Linda S. Heard is a British specialist writer on Middle East affairs. She welcomes feedback and can be contacted by email at heardonthegrapevines@yahoo.co.uk.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Some U.S. holiday terror?
The Great Depression meets the Great Recession
American jihad in Pakistan
Who’s afraid of Hiroshima? Obama’s nuclear hypocrisy
Let’s get fiscal: More stimulus, more government jobs programs, more debt relief
Globalization unchecked: How alien media are suffocating real culture
America’s leadership deficit
The US needs to be censured for its immoral behavior
The Hague’s the place for trials
For Obama it’s one (term) if by war, two if by peace
In a chilly London November, war and remembrance
Dying to prosecute Hasan
What is Israel’s role in the destabilization of Pakistan?
Aung San Suu Kyi, Omar Khadr and Barack Obama: A dreadful tale of what America has become
Fifteen very bad things Republicans would do if they got their selfish way
China’s yuan, not the dollar, is too cheap
The US government and the assassination of Tupac Shakur
The reactor relapse takes 3 hits to the head
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, jihadist or patsy?
The humble tuna