Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Oct 15th, 2009 - 00:28:21


The Republicans and the Taliban: More alike than Rush will admit
By Mary Shaw
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Oct 15, 2009, 00:09

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Just when ACORN needed a break from all the hysterical right-wing finger pointing, along came the perfect diversion: President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. And so a new feeding frenzy began.

Erick Erickson of Redstate.com wrote, “I did not realize the Nobel Peace Prize had an affirmative action quota.”

Glenn Beck chimed in with his usual kind of absurdity: “The Nobel Peace Prize should be turned down by Barack Obama and given to [ . . . ] the tea party goers and the 9-12 Project.”

But the reaction that most caught my attention came from Republican Party chief Rush Limbaugh: “Folks, do you realize something has happened here that we all agree with the Taliban and Iran about and that is he doesn’t deserve the award. Now that’s hilarious, that I’m on the same side of something that the Taliban, and that we all are on the same side as the Taliban.”

And Limbaugh’s words led me to realize that the Republican Party of today has more in common with the Taliban than just a belief that Obama doesn’t deserve the Nobel Prize. In fact, the two groups share more views than Limbaugh would probably want to admit.

For starters, the Republicans and the Taliban both think women need to be kept in their place. The Taliban do this by threatening women who would venture outside the home, and throwing acid on girls who dare to go to school. Fortunately, the Republicans don’t have quite that much physical power over us, so they just make noise about it.

On “Good Morning America” in 2007, Glenn Beck showed his sexist colors during a rant about Hillary Clinton (who dares to pursue -- and achieve -- political power despite her gender): “She had that tone of voice, where she just sounds like [covers his ears]. I can’t listen to it ‘cause it sounds like -- it sounds like my wife saying, ‘Take out the garbage.’” (Nice to see that he thinks so highly of his own wife.)

Ann Coulter, herself a woman, shared her views on the TV show “Politically Incorrect” in 2001: “I think [women] should [ . . . ] not [be allowed to] vote.”

And, as a woman caller explained to Rush Limbaugh himself, on why he’s unpopular with women: “The first time I listened to your show you were criticizing a liberal woman’s blog, and at the end said something to the effect of: ‘Well, at the end of the day she’s a babe so it doesn’t really matter anyways.’”

This was not at all surprising, given some of Limbaugh’s other comments about women. One of my favorites: “Some of these babes, I’m telling you, like the sexual harassment crowd. They’re out there protesting what they actually wish would happen to them sometimes.”

Misogyny aside, the Republicans and the Taliban also share a desire for theocracy. The Taliban did so by instituting Sharia law. The Republican approach is slightly more subtle, via the increased influence of the Religious Right on our government and politics. And they cleverly have an alarming number of Americans convinced this was established as a “Christian nation,” even though our Founding Fathers had quite the opposite intention. (See Thomas Jefferson’s 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists, in which Jefferson defends the concept of a “wall of separation between Church & State.”)

Finally, the Republicans and the Taliban both want Obama to fail, and, by extension, want America to fail. For the Taliban, it’s jihad. Coming from the Republicans, I would call it treason.

Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist, with a focus on politics, human rights, and social justice. She is a former Philadelphia Area Coordinator for the Nobel-Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International, and her views appear regularly in a variety of newspapers, magazines, and websites. Note that the ideas expressed here are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Amnesty International or any other organization with which she may be associated. E-mail: mary@maryshawonline.com.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Some U.S. holiday terror?
The Great Depression meets the Great Recession
American jihad in Pakistan
Who’s afraid of Hiroshima? Obama’s nuclear hypocrisy
Let’s get fiscal: More stimulus, more government jobs programs, more debt relief
Globalization unchecked: How alien media are suffocating real culture
America’s leadership deficit
The US needs to be censured for its immoral behavior
The Hague’s the place for trials
For Obama it’s one (term) if by war, two if by peace
In a chilly London November, war and remembrance
Dying to prosecute Hasan
What is Israel’s role in the destabilization of Pakistan?
Aung San Suu Kyi, Omar Khadr and Barack Obama: A dreadful tale of what America has become
Fifteen very bad things Republicans would do if they got their selfish way
China’s yuan, not the dollar, is too cheap
The US government and the assassination of Tupac Shakur
The reactor relapse takes 3 hits to the head
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, jihadist or patsy?
The humble tuna