Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Jul 2nd, 2009 - 00:47:56


‘And we elect them again and again’*
By Howard Lisnoff
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Jul 2, 2009, 00:12

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Americans (at least some of those who reside in the U.S.) have a very limited sense of history. This can be seen in all the bluster from politicians regarding the rebellion in Iran. Nowhere is there any recounting of the U.S.-backed government of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, who ruled for decades by way of draconian policies toward his own people for the sake of British, U.S., French, and Dutch oil interests. Even the taking of the American Embassy by Iranian students in 1979 was seen here as divorced from the prior history of U.S.-Iranian relations.

So, it came as no surprise that the latest release of tapes from the Nixon White House years garnered no more than a collective yawn from the public, if indeed the actual reaction went that far.

The tapes are monumental in respect to three major issues of the period, though they touch upon many more. Nixon wanted a cease-fire so badly in Vietnam that he commented to his secretary of state, Henry Kissinger, that he would “cut off his (referring to the then president of South Vietnam Nguyen Van Thieu) head if necessary.” In other words, all of his previous rantings about “peace with honor” were just so much bullshit!

The next piece of tape worth scrutinizing was Nixon’s reaction to the historic 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, recognizing the right of women to abortion. Here, Nixon’s racism is placed in clear earshot of the listener. Speaking to an aide he comments, “There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white . . . or a rape.” (Charles Savage, “On Nixon Tapes, Ambivalence Over Abortion, Not Watergate,” The New York Times, June 23, 2009). Nothing additional needs to be added to see Nixon’s well-known intolerance for what it really was.

Although there are much worthier conversations for public scrutiny on these tapes, it is a telephone call between Nixon and evangelist Billy Graham in February 1973 that further cements the view of Nixon as a bald-faced anti-Semite. Graham complains to Nixon on the tape that Jewish-American leaders were “opposing efforts to promote evangelical Christianity.” The two men agree that that tack among Jewish leaders would risk “setting off anti-Semitic sentiment.” Nixon then adds, “What I really think is deep down in this country, there is a lot of anti-Semitism, and all this is going to do is stir it up.” Those sentiments come as no surprise, as Nixon’s anti-Semitism had been long established by his hatred of Jewish activists in the antiwar movement.

One of the better-known election slogans to emerge from any Nixon political campaign was, “Nixon’s The One.” Reading the transcripts of these newly released tapes, even the most casual observers would have to admit that indeed he was!

*From Pete Seeger’s song “What did you learn in school today?”

Howard Lisnoff is a freelance writer. He can be reached through his website howielisnoff.com.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Some are more equal than others
The porous walls between Mayor Bloomberg, Bloomberg L.P. and private deals
No emergency summits for Arab human development crisis
Mousa gives Egyptians a cryptic clue
Afghanistan: It’s not the how but the why of war
Does US-Israeli missile defense war game signal Israeli attack on Iran?
NY skyscraper prices plunge with economy
Rack ’em and screw ’em, boys!
Weapons of mass distraction, again!
Legislating inequality: Last year in California, this year in Maine?
Nearly fully operational: The final countdown to Lisbon success
Palestinians won’t be patient forever
Dollar trouble
US joins ranks of failed states
New names for Wall Street’s old games
Beware a Times/Pentagon ‘virtual coup’ on Afghanistan
Empire in trouble
War criminals are becoming the arbiters of law
Peace prize for promises, promises . . .
Constitutional hypocrisy