Two disparate sectors of the economy in the U.S. are
experiencing a “boon” during the economic depression that has swept much of the
world. Businesses that repair items such as shoes, clothing, and automobiles
are enjoying a surge in customers. And so is the military!
Just four years ago the military fell short of monthly
quotas for enlistees. A booming economy, the unpopularity of the Iraq War, the
poor medical treatment that veterans received after serving in Iraq and
Afghanistan, and the scandals of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay prisons were
turning people away from military service. So-called “moral waivers” were a
mechanism used by the military to fill its ranks with people who had a wide
range of police and criminal records.
In “Military recruiters having no trouble filling quotas,” (The
Florida Sun-Sentinel, December
20, 2008), a typical case is cited as an example of how the economy has acted
as an impetus for military recruitment: “Working for low pay on the evening
shift at a West Palm Beach International House of Pancakes influenced Cheyenne
DaSilva’s decision to enlist, even before the 17-year-old completes her senior
year at Forest Hill Community High School.
DaSilva received an $8,000 signing bonus when she enlisted for three-and-a-half
years. She chose the military police as her specialty. ‘It’s something
exciting, and a guaranteed job,’ DaSilva said.”
An Army recruiter in Florida, Captain Robert Brown,
interviewed for the same article said, “There is no question that the economy
and the unemployment rate have been driving traffic into the recruiting
station. We put a mortgage broker in the Army the other day. These are people
looking for that stability, the paycheck and health benefits.”
The article goes on to describe the plight of a financial
advisor at Bank of America who enlisted as a means of earning money to pay for
a mortgage after her finances turned sour in the malaise of the current
economy. The majority of recruits will find, however, upon leaving the
military, that most jobs in the military are not transferable to the civilian
economy.
And the new spurt in enlistments may come just in time for
the expansion of the war in Afghanistan that is in the works in the incoming
Obama administration.
“As president, I would pursue a new strategy, and begin by
providing at least two additional combat brigades to support our effort in
Afghanistan,” Obama said in an op-ed published June 14, 2008, in The New
York Times, the day before he gave
a speech in Florida on his vision for Iraq and Afghanistan. (Obama campaign website)
Even in bad economic times with the potential for more
recruits for the so-called “good war” in Afghanistan, the military is leaving
nothing to chance. In “Urban Tool in Recruiting by the Army: An Arcade,” (The
New York Times, January 4), an
old recruitment method with a modern twist is highlighted in an example of
recruiting techniques used in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: “At the Franklin
Mills mall here, past the Gap Outlet and the China Buddha Express, is a $13
million video arcade that the Army hopes will become a model for recruitment in
urban areas, where the armed services typically have a hard time attracting
recruits.”
With these techniques and state of the economy, it is easy
to see how the Army surpassed its recruiting goal for the past fiscal year. It
recruited 80,517 people with a goal that it had set at 80,000.
With all the talk of hope and change of the election cycle
just past, it appears that foreign policy will continue to be conducted at the
end of the barrel of a gun. It will be business as usual. It’s difficult to
counter arguments that the Taliban needs to be dealt with through diplomacy
with the reputation of the “good war” being fought in Afghanistan accepted in
many quarters of society in the U.S. Afghanistan remains a country dominated by
warlords, the Taliban, and a profitable opium trade. Despite the accepted cant
in U.S. media outlets, women in Afghanistan have never been fully accepted and
integrated into its society, with great injustices still apparent.
What many recruits will discover upon reporting for military
training is that the military is a closed society whose sole purpose is to
strip the individual of all individuality and break down any resistance to
killing those who have been designated as “the enemy” by the government. It
happened in Vietnam and again in Iraq with devastating results for both the
civilian populations of both countries and the servicemen and women who were
sent to fight those battles. Not much has changed!
Howard Lisnoff teaches writing and is a
freelance writer. He was a war resister during the Vietnam War. He can be
reached at howielisnoff@gmail.com.