Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Dec 3rd, 2008 - 01:33:03


Obama exploits liberal denial
By Mickey Z.
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Dec 3, 2008, 00:14

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

By now, we should expect the soft Left (and more than a few radicals) to gleefully guzzle the Democrat Kool Aid every four years. In 2004, it was Anybody-But-Bush. This year, it was Attack of the Obamatrons.

Hey, when you’re a liberal, harboring multiple delusions comes with the territory, e.g.:

  • Sooner or later, the Democratic Party is gonna wake up and help us “take back” the country.

  • No matter what we think of war, we must always support the troops because sooner or later, the men and women in uniform are gonna wake up and help us “take back” the country.

  • There’s a mysterious mass of Americans out there -- just sitting on the proverbial fence as they wait for us to convince them we are right so they can wake up and help us “take back” the country.
  • There was once a time when the people actually “had” the country.

During presidential election years, of course, the most contemptible liberal lie is this: We shouldn’t vote for the third party candidates who actually represent our deeply held values because (drum roll please) they can’t win. It should be obvious that the only reason a third party candidate “can’t win” is because almost everyone who claims to be progressive votes for a Democrat instead.

This self-fulfilling prophecy comes courtesy of the same folks who apparently believe that marching with giant puppets might help end a war.

The same folks who apparently believe that holding a candlelight vigil might help end hate crimes.

The same folks who apparently believe that a giant rock concert might help end global warming.

The same folks who apparently believe that adhering to state sanctioned free speech zones is a legitimate method of expressing dissent.

I could go on but I’d rather ask this simple question: Why is anyone still trusting the entrenched Left on anything? Thanks to their archaic tactics and dogma, we now face four years of genuflecting before the Pope of Hope as he blatantly spits on every effort toward peace, justice, and solidarity.

It’s gotten to the point where I wouldn’t be surprised if Lord Obama announced that he’s decided to keep Dick Cheney on as vice president . . . you know, in the name of bipartisanship and all. What would be most amusing is how quickly 90 percent of those on the Left would find a way to justify it (and call me “cynical” for not being stoked).

To paraphrase a certain Mr. Diderot, the planet will never be free (or detoxified) until the last politician is strangled with the entrails of the last liberal.

Mickey Z. can be found on the Web at www.mickeyz.net.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Some are more equal than others
The porous walls between Mayor Bloomberg, Bloomberg L.P. and private deals
No emergency summits for Arab human development crisis
Mousa gives Egyptians a cryptic clue
Afghanistan: It’s not the how but the why of war
Does US-Israeli missile defense war game signal Israeli attack on Iran?
NY skyscraper prices plunge with economy
Rack ’em and screw ’em, boys!
Weapons of mass distraction, again!
Legislating inequality: Last year in California, this year in Maine?
Nearly fully operational: The final countdown to Lisbon success
Palestinians won’t be patient forever
Dollar trouble
US joins ranks of failed states
New names for Wall Street’s old games
Beware a Times/Pentagon ‘virtual coup’ on Afghanistan
Empire in trouble
War criminals are becoming the arbiters of law
Peace prize for promises, promises . . .
Constitutional hypocrisy