Online Journal
Front Page 
 
 Donate
 
 Submissions
 
 Announcements
 
 NewsLinks
 
 Special Reports
 
 News Media
 
 Elections & Voting
 
 Health
 
 Religion
 
 Social Security
 
 Analysis
 
 Commentary
 
 Editors' Blog
 
 Reclaiming America
 
 The Splendid Failure of Occupation
 
 The Lighter Side
 
 Reviews
 
 The Mailbag
 
 Online Journal Stores
 Official Merchandise
 Amazon.com
 
 Links
 
 Join Mailing List
Search

Commentary Last Updated: Aug 15th, 2007 - 01:34:55


Tancredo's remarks promote anti-Americanism
By Ahmad Al-Akhras, Ph.D.
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Aug 15, 2007, 01:32

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

It was shocking to hear presidential candidate Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Col.) call for the bombing of Muslim holy sites as a deterrent to terrorist attacks on our nation and that is part of his “presidential anti-terror package.”  When reported overseas, such bigoted words can contribute to anti-Americanism, endangering Americans.

Recently, Tancredo told an audience, "If it is up to me, we are going to explain that an attack on this homeland of that nature would be followed by an attack on the holy sites in Mecca and Medina."  The congressman, two years ago, engaged in similar rhetoric during a radio interview in Florida.

Already, Pakistani leader General Pervez Musharraf, a U.S. ally, has pulled out of a Bush administration supported grand assembly of Pakistani and Afghan tribal leaders, in part due the impact in Pakistan of Tancredo’s comments (along with those of Democratic candidate Sen. Barak Obama). This grand assembly was to be a tool to help build support against the Taliban.

Here at home, personalities more stable than Tancredo's saw the dangerous potential of his words immediately.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters, " . . . the official position of the United States government is that those remarks are just outrageous.” Another spokesperson at State characterized Tancredo’s proposal as “absolutely crazy.”

During a Republican presidential debate in Iowa over the weekend, former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson said, "I sincerely believe that bombing religious artifacts and religious holy sites would do nothing but unify 1 billion Muslims against us."

After the debate, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee said the idea is "appalling." Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) also said, "I wouldn't follow that."

Neil Steinberg of The Chicago Sun-Times was right on the money when he said "Threatening to attack holy cities is what terrorists, not Americans, do."

America's relationship with Muslims and the Islamic world must be a central piece of any future administration's policy.

Sending a message to our Muslim allies in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere that their holy city is a priority target will certainly chill their desire to aid us.

Tancredo’s words will be added to the speeches of the hate mongers as they work to convince influential minds that America hates Islam.

If Rep. Tancredo wants cheap press he should not seek it at the expense of his fellow citizen’s security.

Congressman Tancredo must retract and apologize for these remarks. If not, fellow Americans should let him face a room of empty chairs whenever he seeks to campaign in their states.

Neither Islam nor Muslims are the enemy.  The real enemy is ignorance.

Ahmad Al-Akhras is the Vice Chair of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.  He resides in Columbus, Ohio and can be reached at ahmad@alakhras.org.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Top of Page

Commentary
Latest Headlines
Christmas Day Crotch Bomber tied to Israel, FBI
Oil, gas, gold, copper, etc., in Haiti equals US occupation
Blood lust and bragging rights
Fixing a bad Supreme Court decision
Time for an American intifada?
Markets fail when humans are unregulated
Walk a mile . . .
Lobbyists retreat but never surrender
Obama seeks $200 million fund for Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial security
Gulf anti-missile shield
The defense industry is pleased with Obama
Capitalist tool
Decency and strength
What do Iraqis want?
Blair has slithered off the hook again
So now what?
Supreme Court-porate opinion blesses corruporate campaign financing
Hijinks or undercover ops?
What’s quaking, what’s shaking?
Last rites for America’s near-death democracy